Four things worth noting:
- The fight over SOPA and PIPA is not an unfair fight unduly influenced by billions of dollars in dirty money. While it is true that a billion dollar lobbying industry headed by Capitol Hill insiders helped piece together the bills, the primary opposition to them is also a multibillion dollar industry. Corporate entities like Google make lots of money off of content, most of which is legal and some of which is illegal.
- SOPA and PIPA do not legally place an undue burden on businesses in the sense that it simply requires them to do their due diligence to fight the crime facilitated by their service. This is standard practice. Bars don’t serve drunks, pawn shops can’t buy stolen goods, photo labs won’t reprint copyrighted pictures, and pharmacies have to verify narcotic prescriptions. It’s not silly to suggest that YouTube, which makes money off of each video view, should have to reasonably ensure their content is legal.
- It’s offensive to suggest that SOPA would place the US on par with China, Syria, or Iran in terms of repression and censorship. Being tracked down and imprisoned, beaten, or executed for your internet activity is not the same as losing blog access. Ask the protestors in Tahrir Square.
- There really is a lot of pirated content online.* Any ideas on how to actually reduce that? SOPA is bad, but we all have a compelling interest in reducing the theft of other people’s property, so let’s have alternatives from the anti-SOPA crowd.
*Pet Peeve: It rings a bit hollow for some of my friends to be protesting SOPA while they continue to download movies, music, and games illegally from torrents online.
Posted by Vital Signs Blog 






